Stigma in Toronto, Why at hits current level- HIGH

I have been told that it is Toronto's fault for bringing all those AIDS Bastards here back in 2006 for the World AIDS Conference. That is why this group has to do what it does to this city and its residents.

HIV Agenda I call this, just a random thought I had a couple summers ago, which I wrote down after hearing the above statement.

-------------------------------

What is the right way to act, if you had  conference for another medical issue, would you react the same way,

say,

cancer,

small pox,

chicken pox,

colitis,

etc,

the people that go to conferences are not just people that are living with the condition,

the virus,

but there are researchers, and its place people can share their stories and create support networks.

if you want the virus to get under control, you need to understand the virus itself, but also the mental condition of those living with the virus. How and what they are doing on individual basis, but also what game plans they use in their lives to better themselves. The commonalities around the world are so closely aligned but at the same time agendas for the stop of the virus vary immensely.

It has become aware that the inaction on both sides of the HIV agenda have a divide that widens. Uneducated fear, and complacency on either side is not fueling just a hate, but an atmosphere that helps the virus spread at a greater rate. One side pushes for HIV disclosure and the other side wants people back out of their bedrooms and back alleys of their lives. 

Its seems like a simple solution, it is encompassed in one word, a word we all strive to have in all are relationships, TrusT. We trust that the researchers have the best interests of the people living with HIV, as others hope that they have the best interest of the general population. We Trust them to look at both sides and create a happy medium. At what point does the best interest of the general population of the world over take that of the individual that looks at their mortality on a daily basis. The question stands, with the advance of research today and the medical breakthroughs do people living with the virus have that point of view. Do they look at their mortality in the morning or do they look at the new face of HIV, one surgically altered to hide the fact that they carry a virus that everyday changes them more and more slowly. 

The HIV disclosure reaches a point today where the physical trade marks are not their, and people with out the HIV virus no longer have a visual jumping off point to judge others. They now relay directly on the trust that people living with the virus will not live in fear of persecution to disclose their HIV status.

The disclosure issue in Canada, now has a community that has taken upon themselves out of fear to pull HIV positive  people out of the closet and put them back into a locked closet. They do not trust, and in the same time ban together to peer into the homes and private lives to get people ironically thrown onto the street so in hope they will get sick sooner. They chant they want quarantine, but at the same time want us to walk the streets on a 24 hour basis.

When you look at mental condition which is the best way to way to have someone deal with the mental strain of living with the virus. Some would prefer not to have a the daily burden to know that they have the virus. As others want a continuous reminder to everyone, to not have sex or to wear a condom. The burden of responsibility lies in a an awkward field filled with not just obstacles but pitfalls. They worry is the hidden pitfalls of this group that lurks more in the shadows and alley ways, through hidden cameras and eves-dropping neighbors. They hide behind jobs, intimidation to further their cause. A righteous cause with a soaked social responsibility, of disclosure, they think this surpasses the individual rights of the people they monitor, to save their friends and children. They want to save them from something that has not impacted them directly, or are their fear of their own untested blood. The world of what if, the world they don't understand and yearn on a daily basis to be a part of, and deep down they are a part of it and their own members fear each other, It falls under a sodomastistic cloud. They want us so far away, but pull us into apartments so close to study our behavior and lifestyle, just so they can try to rip it apart from the inside.

Their initial game plan is to destroy the support network of friends that we put together, to start to weaken the mental strength that we all relay on to deal with the virus. In turn they try to make us understand that they control us and it is up to them how and where we can associate and copulate with at any given time. The sick pleasure of control over people they do not know, hidden inside of the social responsibility to save their neighborhood and those the world. Obviously we think of the God complex, people thrown into a garden of utopian ideals, they stand up though covered in the dirt of their own lives. 

When we look at this group of people, which group is spreading the virus at a greater rate, the tested or the untested. If someone states that they have had numerous partners, but know that if they get tested most likely it will return with a positive outcome. Do we now have to look at them in a criminal aspect as well.

When the knowledge hits them that if one of their partners tests positive, and they know this and continue to have unprotected sex, and ignore that persons disclosure, do they hold the mental capacity to work for HIV disclosure and have others that took it upon themselves to expose it to others while hiding their personally relationship with that person.